Blogs

First pelvic mesh injury case begins with jury selection in New Jersey

Posted by Sarah Showard | Jan 07, 2013 | 0 Comments

Gavel

Jury selection began January 7, 2013, in Atlantic County (N.J.) Superior Court over claims the Gynecare Prolift® Pelvic Floor Repair System caused injuries that forced a patient to endure multiple treatments and surgeries and caused permanent damage. Linda Gross, a South Dakota nurse, claims the Johnson & Johnson pelvic mesh implant was defective in design and manufacture and that the company failed to warn her and her doctors about its risks.

Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary, Ethicon Inc., took the Gynecare mesh device and three others off the market in August 2012, claiming lack of “commercial liability” and denying any safety issue. Gross's lawsuit was filed in New Jersey because the company is based in New Brunswick.

In July 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned health care providers and patients that such implants used to repair pelvic organ prolapse, such as in Gross's case, exposed patients to greater risk of injury. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon have denied such allegations.

Last year, a California woman was awarded $5 million and her husband $500,000 after a jury found that transvaginal mesh manufacturer C.R. Bard Inc.'s negligence caused the woman's injuries, including incontinence and chronic pain.

Transvaginal lawsuits with common claims have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, where one judge is managing cases involving Bard, American Medical Systems Inc., Boston Scientific Corp., Ethicon and Coloplast.

Another multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia involves injury claims over Mentor OBTape™. Johnson & Johnson has already settled with some plaintiffs.

About the Author

Sarah Showard

Sarah Showard graduated from the University of Maryland in 1985, Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts in English-Linguistics and a Certification in Women's Studies. She then graduated from New York University School of Law in 1988. Sarah began practice initially as an insurance defense attorney, and has been representing plaintiffs since 1990. Sarah has a son, Benjamin, who recently graduated from The Gregory School and will attend ASU in the fall, with future plans to attend law school and eventually join Showard Law Firm. In her spare time Sarah enjoys horseback riding and spending time in Sonoita with her husband Peter.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Showard Law Firm-Tucson's Local Law Firm for defective drug & medical device claims.

Showard-law-firm-group-photo

Showard Law Firm is dedicated to compassionate representation for our clients who have been injured by defective products, dangerous drugs or the negligence of any individual or company. We are experienced in litigation and ready to ensure you receive the maximum possible settlement for your injuries, medical bills, mental anguish and other losses.

Showard Law Firm celebrates 10 years

10th-anniversary-showard

2016 marked the 10th anniversary of Showard Law Firm. After 18 years of practice, and a prior ten-year partnership, Sarah Showard and her longtime assistant, Maria De La Rosa, opened the doors of Showard Law Firm in October 2006. Sarah and everyone at Showard Law Firm is proud to serve Southern Arizona as the local law firm for defective drug and medical device claims and personal injury.